代写 BTF1010 Business Law

代写 BTF1010 Business Law


BTF1010 Business Law Semester 1, 2016 Memo for Mid-semester Assessment 1 Due Date The mid-semester assessment is due on Friday, 8 April at 13.00. It can only be submitted online through Turnitin. Remember that Turnitin will only become available once you agree to the Plagiarism Declaration online on our Moodle site. Note that the system does allow for earlier submission. Return Date We expect that we will be able to return the assessment in your allocated tutorials in week 8. Alternative arrangements will be announced on Moodle in case you will be unable to collect it in your allocated tutorial. Value This assessment task is worth 20% of your result in the unit. Format The paper should be typed with 12 pt character – any fonts type - and 1.5 line spacing fully justified paragraphs and 3cm margins on A4 pages. Your word limit is 1,000 words. For every 10% - or part thereof – that you go beyond the word limit you will attract a penalty of 0.5 points. The first page is a title page which includes: • your name; • student ID; • tutorial day & time; • tutor’s name; and • word count. This is to be followed by the first page of the assessment (numbered pg 1 – the title page is not numbered). Your assessment must be all in one document only, preferably in .pdf format, but acceptable as a .doc or .docx if you can't create a pdf. No other formats will be accepted. References Cases can be referred to by just using the parties names, i.e. Donoghue v Stevenson or its commonly used ‘nickname’ such as Snail in a Bottle. Make sure that we can identify the case though. Statutes can be referred to by their short name, i.e. Australian Consumer Law or ACL. No other references are needed or should be used, in particular referencing powerpoints or the textbooks is not acceptable. The only acceptable sources are cases and statutes for this assessment. 2 Plagiarism, Collusion etc. You will have to fill in the Plagiarism Declaration before you can submit the assessment. Intentional plagiarism or collusion amounts to cheating under Part 7 of the Monash University (Council) Regulations. Plagiarism: means taking and using another person’s ideas or manner of expressing them and passing them off as one’s own. For example, by failing to give appropriate acknowledgement. The material used can be from any source (staff, students or the internet, published or unpublished works). Collusion: means unauthorised collaboration with another person on assessable written, oral or practical work and includes paying another person to complete all or part of the work. Where there are reasonable grounds for believing that intentional plagiarism or collusion has occurred, this will be reported to the Chief Examiner, who may disallow the work concerned by prohibiting assessment or refer the matter to the Associate Dean, Teaching and Learning. In short, the declaration will provide evidence that you read and agreed to the following information: • I have read the University’s Student Academic Integrity Policy and the University’s Student Academic Integrity: Managing Plagiarism and Collusion Procedures. • I understand the consequences of engaging in plagiarism and collusion as described in Part 7 of the Monash University (Council) Regulations. • I have taken proper care of safeguarding this work and made all reasonable effort to ensure it could not be copied. • I acknowledge that the assessor of this assignment may for the purposes of assessment, reproduce the assignment and: i.  provide to another member of faculty; and/or ii.  submit it to a plagiarism checking service; and/or iii.  submit it to a plagiarism checking service which may then retain a copy of the assignment on its database for the purpose of future plagiarism checking. • I certify that I have not plagiarised the work of others or participated in unauthorised  collaboration  when  preparing  this  assignment. 3 Submission Details The mid-semester assessment can only be submitted online through Turnitin. Remember that Turnitin will only become available once you agree to the Plagiarism Declaration online on our Moodle site. Note that the system does allow for earlier submission. Penalties for Late Lodgement In line with the department’s late policy, for more than 59 minutes a 10% reduction per calendar day is applicable. Meaning for every calendar day, or part thereof, that the assessment is late, it will attract a penalty of 2 points. Special Consideration Submissions for a special consideration, i.e. extension of time, must be presented in writing.  The  special  consideration  form  is  available  at http://www.monash.edu/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/277152/in-semester.pdf Please note that the form and the evidence may be send electronically. Applications for special consideration must be approved by the Chief Examiner, Dr. Kerstin Steiner. Extensions will not be granted by your tutor! Extensions will only be granted with current and legitimate proof – current medical certificate, counsellor’s certificate or other appropriate documented evidence. You should refer to the following website for detailed information concerning special consideration, http://www.monash.edu.au/exams/special-consideration.html The Chief Examiner reserves the right to deny an extension if proof of incapacitation is not sufficient. Students should back-up their work in multiple ways to ensure issues of disk corruption and loss of work are minimised. Extensions will not be granted for loss of work, disk corruption, or internet connection problems. Learning Objectives Assessed This assessment task is designed to test your achievement of assessing legal risks in the area of non-contractual risks and obligations. 4 Marking Criteria Very High High Pass Low Not shown 1. Interpretation and Analysis Fulfils the task and answers correctly. Fulfils  the  task  and answers mostly correctly. Partially fulfils the task and answers somewhat correctly. Does not fulfil the task and answers mostly incorrectly or vice versa. Does not fulfil the task and answers incorrectly. Identifies the salient case law or statutory law. Identifies most relevant case law or statutory law. Identifies some relevant case law or statutory law. Fails to identify salient case law or statutory law. Fails  to  identify  or dismisses relevant case law or statutory law. Identifies  the  salient arguments for and against a position. Identifies most relevant arguments for and against a position. Identifies some relevant arguments for and against a position. Fails  to  identify  salient arguments for and against a position. Fails  to  identify  or dismisses  relevant arguments for and against a position. 2. Communication Appropriate  use  of discipline specific language with sound understanding of the underlying concepts. Use  mostly  discipline specific  language  with occasional misunderstandings in the understanding. Use  some  discipline specific language which is sometimes incorrect. Use some discipline specific language  albeit  incorrectly, lacks understanding. Use mainly lay language and  understanding  not communicated. Presentation  format  and style engaging and highly appropriate  for  the audience. Presentation format and style mostly appropriate for the audience. Presentation format and style sometimes engaging and appropriate for the audience. Presentation format and style lacks  engagement  and  is mainly inappropriate for the audience. Presentation and format not engaging and not appropriate  for  the audience.

代写 BTF1010 Business Law
  3. Structure Logical flow of ideas and content  in  the  right sections. Mostly well structured and content mostly in the right section. Used  structure  and content sometimes in the illogical area. Used  structure  though contents mostly in the wrong area. Lack of structure Coherence between and within sections. Mostly coherent between and within sections. Some coherence between but sometimes not within sections or vice versa. Some coherence between but mostly not within sections or vice versa. Lack of coherence within and between sections. Title  and  headings  are present, clear, reflect on and relate to each other. Title and headings are present and mostly clear, reflect on and relate to each other. Title and headings are present, but require some refinement. Title and headings may be present but require refinement and/or may not relate to each other. Title and headings are not present. 4.  Evaluation and Conclusion Thoughtfully  evaluates alternative points of view. Offers  evaluations  of alternative points of view. Some  evaluation  of alternative points of view. Superficially  evaluates alternative points of view. Ignores alternative points of view. Draws justified conclusions based on clearly explained reasons. Draws justified conclusion on  mostly  explained reasons. Draws  justified conclusions  based  on some evidence. Draws unjustified conclusions based on little evidence. Draws  irrelevant  or unjustified conclusions. Please note that the marking criteria do not carry equal weight. Furthermore, some of them might not be applicable to a particular question. So they are only indicative as to how you went overall in the assessment task not a specific question. 5 Scenario: Clean Aqua Clean Aqua Pty Ltd has developed a technology for treating industrial waste streams that can recover about 97% of the water content, and up to 99% of mineral salts and other solids, for re-use. This technology has been tested successfully in aluminium smelters, biofuel plants, and other demanding applications. The first commercial installations will be made in the first half of this year. The next step in the company’s plan is to market a domestic appliance for residential use of its technology. It has developed a small home appliance which it has named Clean Aqua. Clean Aqua treats “grey water” waste streams from homes, dormitories, hotels, apartment blocks, and other accommodation to produce water for use in gardens, swimming pools, toilets, washing machines and dish washers, and perhaps basins, showers, and troughs. A home appliance can be coupled with a solar hot water heater, air conditioner, or even a refrigerator. At first, a small batch, of home Clean Aqua appliances are produced and marketed. The appliances come with a warning on the package which says: Warning: Water produced by Clean Aqua is not fit for oral consumption. Water produced by Clean Aqua is only suitable for use in gardens, swimming pools, toilets, clothes and dish washers. One of the retailers of Clean Aqua, called EnviroPro Pty Ltd, sells a ‘display model’ of a home Clean Aqua appliance to a customer after it runs out of packaged models. They no longer have the packaging for the home Clean Aqua appliance so they wrap it in recycled paper and hand it to the customer who is very excited with their purchase. The customer takes the Clean Aqua appliance home, installs it and begins using the water produced by it for drinking and cooking as they have not read the warning. The customer subsequently falls sick with mild dysentery, misses approximately five weeks of work and develops Irritable Bowel Syndrome which will impact upon their long term quality of life. 1. What are the legal risks that Clean Aqua Pty Ltd is facing under statute law for the product, that is the home Clean Aqua appliance? 10 points 2. What are the legal risks that Clean Aqua Pty Ltd is facing for naming the product ‘Clean Aqua’ under a. common law; and 5 points b. statute law 5 points IMPORTANT INSTRUCTIONS Please note that the discussion for all those questions is limited to non-contractual risks. You will have to answer ALL questions. Please note that if the facts do not warrant a discussion of all the elements of a legal risk, only the relevant elements should be discussed.

代写 BTF1010 Business Law